Make blob: URLs cross‑realm and allow file‑backed Blob cloning

[jimmywarting]

Detailed description:

• Add a global native blob URL registry so blob: URLs created in one realm are resolvable in another (e.g. main → worker). Registry entries store the DataQueue and metadata, are mutex‑protected, and are cleaned up via Environment cleanup hooks to avoid teardown races.
• Extend the DataQueue / Entry reader API to accept an optional Environment*, and update FdEntry reader creation so file handles and reader resources are created in the target environment/realm. This enables structured cloning / transferring of file‑backed Blobs across workers.
• Remove the JS-side prohibition on cloning file‑backed blobs so structuredClone() succeeds for file‑backed Blobs.
• Wire up Blob native bindings to use the new registry when storing/getting/revoking blob URLs; ensure Blob::GetDataObject constructs the Blob in the receiving environment.
• Add/update regression tests covering URL resolution in workers and cloning of file‑backed Blobs.

Files changed (high level):

• node_blob.cc: add global blob URL registry, Store/Get/Revoke helpers, env cleanup hook integration, Blob::StoreDataObject/GetDataObject/RevokeObjectURL wiring.
• queue.h, queue.cc: add optional Environment* parameter to Entry::get_reader, propagate env through DataQueue, implement FdEntry::ReaderImpl::Create(entry, env) to open file handles in the reader env.
• blob.js: remove kNotCloneable flag for file‑backed Blobs so they can be cloned/ transferred.
• test-blob-url-worker.js: new/updated regression test validating resolveObjectURL in a worker for a URL created on the main thread.
• test-blob-file-backed.js: update test to assert structuredClone() succeeds for file‑backed Blobs and that cloned content/metadata match.

Rationale and tests:

• These changes fix two related issues: blob URLs that only worked per‑realm, and file‑backed Blobs that were prevented from being cloned/transferred. Both were blocking cross‑realm Blob usage (main ↔ worker).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.56604% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.63%. Comparing base (b2f6aa3) to head (b48ce98).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/node_blob.cc	90.47%	1 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
src/dataqueue/queue.cc	90.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #63103      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.65%   89.63%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         712      712              
  Lines      220512   220841     +329     
  Branches    42289    42374      +85     
==========================================
+ Hits       197690   197953     +263     
- Misses      14663    14706      +43     
- Partials     8159     8182      +23     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/internal/blob.js	99.44% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
src/dataqueue/queue.cc	68.29% <90.00%> (+0.25%)	⬆️
src/node_blob.cc	70.00% <90.47%> (-3.43%)	⬇️

... and 55 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[aduh95]

Can you address the linter failure and fix the commit message please?